Access to Justice Bill [Lords] — 21 Jul 1999
Mr Peter Snape MP, West Bromwich East voted with the majority (Aye).
Lords Reasons for disagreeing to certain of the Commons amendments considered.
I beg to move, That this House does not insist on Commons amendments Nos. 27 to 30, to which the Lords have disagreed.
Lords Reason:
Because it is not appropriate for the Legal Services Commission itself to provide advice, assistance or representation to individuals involved in criminal investigations or criminal proceedings.
Question put , That this House does not insist on Commons amendments Nos. 27 to 30:--
The House divided: Ayes 294, Noes 166.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 126 (+2 tell) | 0 | 79.5% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 293 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 70.9% |
LDem | 0 | 34 | 0 | 73.9% |
PC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25.0% |
SDLP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
UUP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 40.0% |
Total: | 294 | 166 | 0 | 72.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |