Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill — Incapacity benefit: restriction to recent contributors — 3 Nov 1999
Gwyneth Dunwoody MP, Crewe and Nantwich voted in the minority (No).
Lords amendments considered.
Lords amendment: No. 42, to leave out clause 57.
I beg to move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Madam Speaker:
With this, it will be convenient to take Government amendments (c), (a), (b) and (d) related thereto, Lords amendment No. 43 and Government amendments (c), (a), (b), (d) and (e) related thereto, Lords amendments Nos. 44 and 45, Lords amendment No. 46 and amendments (a) to (d) in lieu thereof, and Lords amendment No. 183.
It being Seven o'clock, Mr. Deputy Speaker put the Question already proposed from the Chair, pursuant to Order this day.
Question put, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment:--
The House divided: Ayes 325, Noes 265.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 149 (+2 tell) | 0 | 93.8% |
Independent | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 324 (+2 tell) | 54 | 0 | 91.3% |
LDem | 0 | 45 | 0 | 97.8% |
PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
SNP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 0 | 7 | 0 | 70.0% |
Total: | 325 | 265 | 0 | 92.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote