[S1M-430.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 19 Jan 2000 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-430.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-01-19 is:
*S1M-430.1 Phil Gallie: Sexual Offences (Amendment) Bill—As an amendment to motion (S1M-430) in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, leave out from "endorses" to end and insert "considers that the principles of equalising the age of consent for homosexual and heterosexual activity and creating a new criminal offence of breach of trust as set out in the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Bill considered by the UK Parliament in the 1998-99 parliamentary session fall entirely within the remit of the Scottish Parliament and on that basis agrees that these matters be judged only after full consultation with the Scottish people."
You can search for this motion (S1M-430.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-430.1, in the name of Phil Gallie, which seeks to amend motion S1M-430, in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, on the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Bill, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?
No.
There will be a division. Those who wish to support Phil Gallie's amendment should press the yes button now.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 94.4% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 87.3% |
LDem | 12 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
SNP | 26 | 1 | 0 | 81.8% |
SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 90 | 18 | 0 | 85.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Fergus Ewing | Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber | SNP | aye |