Greater London Authority (Election Expenses) Order 2000 — 22 Feb 2000 at 18:01
Baroness Knight of Collingtree voted with the majority (Content).
rose to move, as an amendment to the above Motion, to leave out all the words after "That" and insert "this House declines to approve the draft order laid before it on 3rd February and calls on Her Majesty's Government to lay an order which provides that candidates are allowed one freepost delivery per household".
On Question, Whether the said amendment shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 215; Not-Contents, 150.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||137 (+1 tell)||0||61.9%|
|Lab||0||135 (+2 tell)||77.8%|
|LDem||45 (+1 tell)||0||86.8%|
|Viscount Allenby of Megiddo||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Burns||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Currie of Marylebone||Crossbench||no|
|Baroness Darcy de Knayth||Crossbench||no|
|Baroness Masham of Ilton||Crossbench||no|
|Baroness Richardson of Calow||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Stern||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Viscount Tenby||Crossbench (front bench)||no|