Financial Services and Markets Bill — 30 Mar 2000 at 19:27
Baroness Falkender was absent
Clause 293 [Complaints about recognised bodies]:
[Amendment No. 257B not moved.]
moved Amendment No. 257C:
Page 151, line 43, leave out subsection (2) and insert--
("( ) The arrangements made by the Authority must provide for the investigator to report to the Authority on the result of his investigation and, if he considers a complaint to be well-founded, to make recommendations to the Authority on the steps (if any) which the recognised body should take to remedy the matter complained of.
( ) If the investigator reports to the Authority that a complaint is well-founded, the Authority may direct the recognised body to take specified steps in response to the investigator's report.
( ) Specified steps may include the payment by the recognised body of a specified sum or specified sums to a specified person or specified persons.
( ) "Independent" means appearing to the Authority to be independent of the recognised body.
( ) "Specified" means specified by the Authority.").
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 257C) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 30; Not-Contents, 73.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 27 (+2 tell) | 12.6% |
Crossbench | 4 | 0 | 2.4% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 65 (+2 tell) | 0 | 37.0% |
LDem | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
UUP | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 71 | 27 | 16.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |