Amendment to Commons Amendment No. 180A — 12 Jun 2000 at 16:04
Baroness Crawley voted with the majority (Not-Content).
180B Line 8, at end insert-
("and such provision may specify that behaviour conforming with the City Code is behaviour which is considered by the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers as conforming with the City Code").
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 180B), as an amendment to Commons Amendment No. 180A, shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 183; Not-Contents, 188.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 152 (+2 tell) | 66.4% |
Crossbench | 7 | 27 | 20.7% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 140 (+2 tell) | 0 | 71.4% |
LDem | 37 | 0 | 59.7% |
Total: | 186 | 179 | 56.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Burns | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Craig of Radley | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness Greengross | Crossbench | no |
Lord Joffe | Crossbench | no |
Lord Roll of Ipsden | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Stern | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness Strange | Crossbench | no |