[S1M-1008.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 15 Jun 2000 at 16:53

This looks like the vote on S1M-1008.2

The description in the bulletin on 2000-06-15 is:

*S1M-1008.2 Roseanna Cunningham: Crime and Punishment—As an amendment to motion (S1M-1008) in the name of Phil Gallie, leave out from first "notes" to end and insert "recognises that issues of crime and punishment are complex; contends that to ensure public confidence a criminal justice system requires to be effective, which in turn depends on adequate resourcing at every level; further recognises that there is some identifiable concern amongst the public about both current sentencing patterns and the effectiveness of detention; welcomes the fact that Scotland has human rights responsibilities as a result of the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights, and calls upon the Scottish Executive to consider the establishment of an accurate review of public attitudes to sentencing and detention which would inform both the judiciary and the Scottish Prison Service and further to address urgently the current under-resourcing of all parts of the criminal justice system in Scotland". Supported by: Tricia Marwick*, Michael Russell*, Bruce Crawford*

You can search for this motion (S1M-1008.2) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

Amendment S1M-1008.2 therefore falls. The next question is, that motion S1M-1008, in the name of Phil Gallie, on crime and punishment, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |