[S1M-1091] Decision Time — 6 Jul 2000 at 17:08
This looks like the vote on S1M-1091
The description in the bulletin on 2000-07-05 is:
*S1M-1091 Susan Deacon: Modernisation in the NHS-That the Parliament recognises the Scottish Executive's commitment to the NHS in Scotland and to improving the health of the Scottish people; supports the Scottish Executive's commitment to build on the founding principles of the NHS and to providing a modern health service designed around the needs of patients; recognises that the delivery of a modern NHS requires both resources and reform; welcomes the Scottish Executive's commitment to target its record investment in the NHS to areas of greatest need and to those changes which have greatest benefits for patients, and supports the Scottish Executive's plans for the modernisation of the NHS in Scotland. Supported by: Iain Gray*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1091) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S1M-1091, in the name of Susan Deacon, on modernisation in the NHS, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 94.7% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 48 | 1 | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 28 | 0 | 84.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 64 | 51 | 0 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Cathie Craigie | Cumbernauld and Kilsyth | Lab | no |