Football (Disorder) Bill — Amendments of the Football Spectators Act 1989 — 17 Jul 2000

John Prescott MP, Kingston upon Hull East did not vote.

It being after 12 midnight, The Chairman, pursuant to Order [this day], proceeded to put forthwith the Questions necessary for the disposal of the business to be concluded at that hour.

Clauses 5 to 7 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Amendments made: No. 29, in page 6, line 2, leave out from "football" to end of line 5.

Schedule 1, as amended, agreed to.

Schedules 2 and 3 agreed to.

Bill reported, with amendments, pursuant to Order [this day].

As amended in the Committee, considered.

I beg to move amendment No. 2, in page 1, line 40, at end insert--

'( ) Before making an order under subsection (4), the Secretary of State must lay a report about the working of this Act before each House of Parliament.'.

report about the working of this Act.

Amendment agreed to.

I beg to move amendment No. 4, in page 4, line 37, at end insert--

'but, for the purposes of paragraph (a), any football match included in the qualifying or pre-qualifying stages of the tournament is to be left out of account.'.

shall not include any . . . qualifying or pre-qualifying stages.

for the purposes of paragraph (a)

Amendment agreed to .

I beg to move amendment No. 6, in page 5, line 27, leave out--

'caused and contributed to any violence or disorder'

12.30 am

That condition is that the respondent has at any time . . . been convicted of an offence involving violence or other relevant offence in the United Kingdom or elsewhere.

caused or contributed to any violence or disorder.

satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that making a banning order would help to prevent violence or disorder at or in connection with any regulated football matches.

it is proved on the application that the condition in subsection (2) above is met.

Question put, That the amendment be made:--

The House divided: Ayes 43, Noes 196.

Historical Hansard | Online Hansard |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con11 006.9%
Independent0 1033.3%
Lab184 (+2 tell) 4145.9%
LDem0 36 (+2 tell)080.9%
PC0 1025.0%
Total:195 42138.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Diane AbbottHackney North and Stoke NewingtonLab (minister)aye
Mr Harry BarnesNorth East DerbyshireLabaye
Jeremy CorbynIslington NorthLabaye
John Martin McDonnellHayes and HarlingtonLab (minister)aye
Paul TruswellPudseyLabboth

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive