Local Government Bill, removing bullying clause — 24 Jul 2000 at 20:28
Lord Armstrong of Ilminster voted with the majority (Content).
Wikipedia has plenty of information and history on Section 28 at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_28
The Commons proposed amendment 377 to disagree with Baroness Young's amendment to add a clause on bullying to section 28. Baroness Young's amendment, which this vote is on, simply said the House disagreed with the Commons amendment, rather than agreed.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||177 (+2 tell)||5||81.8%|
|Lab||17||141 (+2 tell)||82.9%|
|Lord Gilmour of Craigmillar||Con||no|
|Lord Norton of Louth||Con||no|
|Lord St John of Fawsley||Con||no|
|Lord Brooks of Tremorfa||Lab||aye|
|Lord Cocks of Hartcliffe||Lab||aye|
|Lord Evans of Parkside||Lab||aye|
|Lord Lofthouse of Pontefract||Lab||aye|
|The Earl of Longford||Lab||aye|
|Lord Mason of Barnsley||Lab||aye|
|Lord Patel of Blackburn||Lab||aye|
|Lord Shore of Stepney||Lab||aye|