[S1M-1301.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 2 Nov 2000 at 17:04
John Swinney MP, North Tayside voted in the minority (No).
This looks like the vote on S1M-1301.1
The description in the bulletin on 2000-11-02 is:
*S1M-1301.1 Angus MacKay: Rates Relief for Small Businesses-As an amendment to motion (S1M-1301) in the name of Mr Kenneth Gibson, leave out from "resolves" to end and insert "commends the Executive for delivering a 1p reduction in the poundage applied to small businesses with a rateable value of less than £10,000; notes that the revaluation of business rates has been delivered with the minimum turbulence for Scottish business and was conducted on a clear partnership basis with full participation from business rate payers and local authorities at every stage in the process, and welcomes the Executive's current consideration of the case for small business rate relief." Supported by: Peter Peacock*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1301.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S1M-1301.1, in the name of Angus MacKay, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1301, in the name of Mr Kenneth Gibson, on rates relief for small businesses, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 94.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 90.7% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 29 | 0 | 87.9% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 62 | 50 | 0 | 88.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||