Freedom of Information Bill — 14 Nov 2000 at 18:35

Lord Lucas voted in the minority (Content).

[Amendments Nos. 19 and 20 not moved.]

Clause 10 [Time for compliance with request]:

moved Amendment No. 21:

Page 6, line 28, leave out ("subsections (2) and (3)") and insert ("subsection (2)").

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 21) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 79; Not-Contents, 148.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop1 03.8%
Con0 68 (+2 tell)31.1%
Crossbench2 96.9%
Lab115 (+2 tell) 060.3%
LDem27 043.5%
Other1 05.3%
Total:146 7733.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Strange Crossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive