Freedom of Information Bill — 14 Nov 2000 at 22:45

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted with the majority (Not-Content).

Clause 35 [Prejudice to effective conduct of public affairs]:

moved Amendment No. 45:

Page 21, line 25, leave out (", in the reasonable opinion of a qualified person,").

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 45) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 22; Not-Contents, 81.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 156.5%
Crossbench1 43.1%
Lab74 (+2 tell) 1 (+2 tell)39.5%
LDem4 06.5%
Total:79 2015.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Palmer Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Archer of SandwellLabtellaye
Baroness Hilton of EggardonLab (minister)tellaye
Baroness Whitaker Labaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive