[S1M-1404.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 30 Nov 2000 at 17:05
This looks like the vote on S1M-1404.2
The description in the bulletin on 2000-11-30 is:
*S1M-1404.2 Iain Gray: District Courts-As an amendment to motion (S1M-1404) in the name of Phil Gallie, leave out from "and calls" to end and insert "; recognises that the Crown has worked to protect business in District Courts and that this has proved successful except in the case of Glasgow, and urges the suspension of further action affecting the courts." Supported by: Ben Wallace*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1404.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-1404.2, in the name of Iain Gray, which seeks to amend motion S1M-1404, in the name of Phil Gallie, on district courts, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 19 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
SNP | 0 | 27 | 0 | 81.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 62 | 49 | 0 | 87.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |