Hunting Bill [Money] — 20 Dec 2000
Patrick McLoughlin MP, West Derbyshire voted in the minority (No).
Queen's recommendation having been signified --
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 52(1)(a) (Money resolutions and ways and means resolutions in connection with bills),
That, for the purposes of any Act resulting from the Hunting Bill, it is expedient to authorise--
(1) the payment out of money provided by Parliament of--
(a) grants and loans made by the Secretary of State to the Hunting Authority or to ISAH Limited,
(b) any other expenses of the Secretary of State incurred in consequence of the Act, and
(c) any increase attributable to the Act in the sums payable out of money so provided under any other enactment, and
(2) the payment into the Consolidated Fund of sums received by a Minister of the Crown by virtue of the Act.-- [Mr. Jamieson.]
The House divided: Ayes 329, Noes 92.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||1||81 (+2 tell)||0||52.5%|
|Lab||309 (+2 tell)||0||0||74.8%|
|Ann Widdecombe||Maidstone and The Weald||Con||aye|
|Alan Beith||Berwick-upon-Tweed||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Malcolm Bruce||Gordon||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Mr John Burnett||Torridge and West Devon||LDem||no|
|Mr Archy Kirkwood||Roxburgh and Berwickshire||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Mr Richard Livsey||Brecon and Radnorshire||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Robert Smith||West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine||LDem (front bench)||no|