[S1M-1618] Decision Time — 7 Feb 2001 at 17:00
Dennis Canavan MP, Falkirk West abstained
This looks like the vote on S1M-1618
The description in the bulletin on 2001-02-02 is:
*S1M-1618 Mr Jim Wallace: Criminal Justice and Police Bill—That the Parliament notes the provisions on information disclosure for criminal proceedings and powers of seizure contained in Parts II and III of the Criminal Justice and Police Bill currently before the UK Parliament; recognises the practical value of consistency across the United Kingdom for information disclosure for criminal investigation, and for powers of seizure as they relate to certain United Kingdom bodies and local authority officials, and agrees that the relevant provisions to achieve this end in this Bill should be considered by the UK Parliament; further notes that the Bill allows certain warrants issued in England and Wales to be executed in Scotland, recognises the importance of mutual execution of warrants for law enforcement, and agrees that the relevant provision to achieve this end in this Bill should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Iain Gray*
The description in the bulletin on 2001-02-05 is:
S1M-1618 Mr Jim Wallace: Criminal Justice and Police Bill—That the Parliament notes the provisions on information disclosure for criminal proceedings and powers of seizure contained in Parts II and III of the Criminal Justice and Police Bill currently before the UK Parliament; recognises the practical value of consistency across the United Kingdom for information disclosure for criminal investigation, and for powers of seizure as they relate to certain United Kingdom bodies and local authority officials, and agrees that the relevant provisions to achieve this end in this Bill should be considered by the UK Parliament; further notes that the Bill allows certain warrants issued in England and Wales to be executed in Scotland, recognises the importance of mutual execution of warrants for law enforcement, and agrees that the relevant provision to achieve this end in this Bill should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Iain Gray
You can search for this motion (S1M-1618) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that motion S1M-1618, in the name of Mr Jim Wallace, on the Criminal Justice and Police Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 84.2% |
Independent | 0 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 83.6% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
SNP | 0 | 0 | 29 | 87.9% |
SSP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Total: | 76 | 0 | 32 | 85.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |