Capital Allowances Bill — 13 Feb 2001
Dominic Grieve MP, Beaconsfield did not vote.
Question again proposed, That the Bill be now read the Third time.
That is the end of the first sentence. To make matters crystal clear, clause 48(6) states:
"The business passes the hypothetical company test as a small or medium-sized company in relation to the expenditure in question if, on the assumptions in subsection (5), the company would qualify (or be treated as qualifying) as small or medium-sized under the relevant companies legislation in relation to the financial year in which the expenditure is assumed to be incurred.
In this Part "car" means a mechanically propelled road vehicle other than one--
(a) of a construction primarily suited for the conveyance of goods or burden of any description, or
(b) of a type not commonly used as a private vehicle and unsuitable for such use.
(AQE-TDR) X A--B
is not a terribly lucid explanation of how one goes about calculating one's balancing allowance as an employee? I pity the poor employee who has to use that formula.
Question put, That the Question be now put:--
The House divided: Ayes 238, Noes 31.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||14 (+2 tell)||0||10.0%|
|Lab||238 (+2 tell)||0||0||57.6%|