[S1M-1699] Decision Time — 1 Mar 2001 at 17:06
Gil Paterson MP, Central Scotland abstained
This looks like the vote on S1M-1699
The description in the bulletin on 2001-02-28 is:
*S1M-1699 Susan Deacon: Primary Care—That the Parliament applauds the vital contribution which community-based health professionals make to the health and health care of the people of Scotland and affirms the commitment in the Executive’s health plan Our National Health: a plan for action, a plan for change to developing these services. Supported by: Malcolm Chisholm*
You can search for this motion (S1M-1699) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S1M-1699, in the name of Susan Deacon, on primary care, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 89.5% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 90.9% |
| LDem | 12 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 29 | 87.9% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 62 | 17 | 34 | 88.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||