International Development Bill [Money] — 6 Mar 2001
Mark Todd MP, South Derbyshire voted with the majority (Aye).
Queen's recommendation having been signified --
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 52(1)(a) (Money resolutions and ways and means resolutions in connection with bills),
That for the purpose of any Act resulting from the International Development Bill, it is expedient to authorise--
(1) the payment out of money provided by Parliament of
(a) any expenses incurred by the Secretary of State by virtue of this Act;
(b) any sums required by him for fulfilling any guarantee given under this Act;
(c) any increase attributable to this Act in the sums payable out of money so provided by virtue of any other Act; and
(2) the payment of sums into the Consolidated Fund.-- [Mr. Sutcliffe.]
The House proceeded to a Division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 1 | 60 (+2 tell) | 0 | 39.4% |
DUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 291 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 70.3% |
LDem | 19 | 0 | 0 | 40.4% |
PC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25.0% |
UUP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 44.4% |
Total: | 312 | 65 | 0 | 59.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Peter Bottomley | Worthing West | Con (front bench) | aye |