Deferred Divisions — Animal By-products — 14 Mar 2001
Gwyneth Dunwoody MP, Crewe and Nantwich voted with the majority (Aye).
That this House takes note of European Union Documents Nos. 12648/00, a draft Council Regulation laying down the health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption, and 12646/00, a draft Council Directive amending Council Directives 90/425/EEC and 92/118/EEC as regards health requirements for animal by-products; and supports the Government's objective of achieving a revised Regulation to protect animal and public health whilst ensuring that controls are proportionate to the risk they are designed to address.
The House divided: Ayes 348, Noes 10.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3.8% |
DUP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 294 | 0 | 0 | 70.5% |
LDem | 42 | 0 | 0 | 89.4% |
PC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
SDLP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
SNP | 3 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% |
UUP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 55.6% |
Total: | 348 | 10 | 0 | 55.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Christopher Chope | Christchurch | Con (front bench) | no |
Anthony Steen | Totnes | Con | no |