Health and Social Care Bill — 22 Mar 2001 at 17:04

Lord Grenfell voted with the majority (Not-Content).

moved Amendments Nos. 215 to 219:

Page 39, line 38, leave out "to facilities and persons" and insert "in relation to the services of officers of Special Health Authorities to be"
Page 39, line 39, at end insert--

"( ) For the purposes of subsection (6)--

(a) the Secretary of State may give directions to an NHS trust requiring it to make facilities or the services of persons available as mentioned there; but

(b) subsections (1) and (2) of section 27 above apply in relation to the services of such persons as they apply in relation to the services of officers to be made available by virtue of section 26 above by a Health Authority, Special Health Authority or Primary Care Trust." Page 40, line 16, at end insert "on terms to be determined by him"

Page 40, line 19, leave out "The terms of appointment of the other members, and"
Page 40, line 20, leave out "they" and insert "the other members"

On Question, amendments agreed to.

moved Amendment No. 220:

Page 40, line 32, leave out from "services" to end of line 34 and insert--

"(aa) medical practitioner performing personal medical services under section 28C arrangements;"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 220) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 79; Not-Contents, 104.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 73 (+2 tell)34.7%
Lab92 (+2 tell) 049.2%
LDem0 00.0%
Other1 19.1%
Crossbench9 37.6%
Total:102 7728.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive