[S1M-2012] Decision Time — 21 Jun 2001 at 16:59
Alex Neil MP, Central Scotland voted in the minority (No).
This looks like the vote on S1M-2012
The description in the bulletin on 2001-06-14 is:
*S1M-2012 Des McNulty on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body: Holyrood Project—That the Parliament notes the terms of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s (SPCB) report of 13 June 2001; notes that £60 million of the construction costs for the new Parliament building has been committed to date and that a further £57 million (at 1998 prices) remains to be let; further notes that building industry inflation is currently estimated to be adding at least 16% to the costs of packages remaining to be let and that under the construction management contract there are additional and not fully quantifiable risks to which the project may be exposed between now and completion; directs the SPCB, through the Holyrood Progress Group, to work with the design and project teams to complete the project without compromising quality, while managing risks rigorously, and requires the SPCB, on a quarterly basis, to provide information to the Parliament’s Finance Committee on the progress of the project in respect of inflation and materialisation of risk in order to inform the committee’s consideration of the annual Budget Bill. Supported by: Robert Brown*, Mr Andrew Welsh*
The description in the bulletin on 2001-06-18 is:
S1M-2012 Des McNulty on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body: Holyrood Project—That the Parliament notes the terms of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s (SPCB) report of 13 June 2001; notes that £60 million of the construction costs for the new Parliament building has been committed to date and that a further £57 million (at 1998 prices) remains to be let; further notes that building industry inflation is currently estimated to be adding at least 16% to the costs of packages remaining to be let and that under the construction management contract there are additional and not fully quantifiable risks to which the project may be exposed between now and completion; directs the SPCB, through the Holyrood Progress Group, to work with the design and project teams to complete the project without compromising quality, while managing risks rigorously, and requires the SPCB, on a quarterly basis, to provide information to the Parliament’s Finance Committee on the progress of the project in respect of inflation and materialisation of risk in order to inform the committee’s consideration of the annual Budget Bill. Supported by: Robert Brown, Mr Andrew Welsh
The description in the bulletin on 2001-06-21 is:
S1M-2012 Holyrood Project (lodged on 13 June 2001) Mr John Home Robertson*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2012) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S1M-2012, in the name of Des McNulty, on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, on the Holyrood project, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 94.7% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 53 | 0 | 0 | 96.4% |
LDem | 11 | 3 | 0 | 87.5% |
SNP | 10 | 8 | 10 | 84.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 75 | 33 | 10 | 92.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Donald Gorrie | Central Scotland | LDem | no |
Keith Raffan | Mid Scotland and Fife | LDem | no |
Mike Rumbles | West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine | LDem | no |