[S1M-2162] Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill — 6 Sep 2001 at 10:08
Duncan McNeil MP, Greenock and Inverclyde voted with the majority (Aye).
This looks like the vote on S1M-2162
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-05 is:
*S1M-2162 Sarah Boyack: Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill be treated as an emergency bill. Supported by: Lewis Macdonald*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2162) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The question is, that motion S1M-2162, in the name of Sarah Boyack, on treating the Erskine Bridge Tolls Bill as an emergency bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 12 | 0 | 0 | 63.2% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 87.3% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
SNP | 0 | 24 | 0 | 72.7% |
Total: | 73 | 25 | 0 | 77.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |