[S1M-2207.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 20 Sep 2001 at 17:01
Irene McGugan MP, North East Scotland abstained
This looks like the vote on S1M-2207.2
The description in the bulletin on 2001-09-20 is:
*S1M-2207.2 Susan Deacon: Improving Patient Care-As an amendment to motion (S1M-2207) in the name of David McLetchie, leave out from "built" to end and insert ", notes the progress that has already been made across Scotland in improving services for patients and believes that continued implementation of Our National Health: a plan for action, a plan for change will deliver increasing benefits for patients, with the objective of high quality care for all." Supported by: Malcolm Chisholm*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2207.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S1M-2207.2, in the name of Susan Deacon, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2207, in the name of David McLetchie, on improving patient care, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 84.2% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 81.8% |
| LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 12 | 36.4% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 60 | 16 | 14 | 70.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||