Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill [HL] — 13 Nov 2001 at 19:23
Lord Christopher was absent
Clause 120 [Invitation to participate]:
moved Amendment No. 67:
Page 61, line 40, at end insert-
"(6) A notice of invitation to participate shall not be invalidated by any inaccuracy in any of the particulars required by or by virtue of this section.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
Schedule 8 [Enfranchisement by company: amendments]:
moved Amendments Nos. 68 and 69:
Page 102, line 20, leave out "RTE company" and insert "company (referred to in this Chapter as a RTE company)"
Page 108, line 24, leave out "section" and insert "sections 1(1) and"
On Question, amendments agreed to.
Clause 123 [Valuation date]:
moved Amendment No. 70:
Page 62, line 9, leave out from "payable)," to end of line 10 and insert "in paragraph 1(1), for the definition of "the valuation date" substitute-
""the valuation date" means the date of service of the reversioner's counter-notice.""
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 70) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 52; Not-Contents, 123.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 1 | 0 | 3.8% |
Con | 0 | 49 (+2 tell) | 22.2% |
Crossbench | 3 | 1 | 2.3% |
Lab | 98 (+2 tell) | 0 | 50.0% |
LDem | 19 | 0 | 28.8% |
Total: | 121 | 50 | 25.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Powell of Bayswater | Crossbench | aye |