Football (Disorder) (Amendment) Bill — Clause 1 — Repeal of Provisions of Football (Disorder) Act 2000 — 14 Nov 2001 at 21:07
Jim Cousins MP, Newcastle upon Tyne Central did not vote.
I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time.
The Bill may be short, but it has been the subject of careful scrutiny by the House. I shall not repeat what was said in earlier debates although I was surprised by the power of my oratory when the hon. Member for Beaconsfield (Mr. Grieve) decided after all to enter the same Lobby as the Government instead of supporting his own amendment.
Question put, That the Bill be now read the Third time:-
The House divided: Ayes 270, Noes 51.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.2% |
DUP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 60.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 269 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 66.1% |
LDem | 0 | 43 (+2 tell) | 0 | 86.5% |
UUP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 270 | 51 | 0 | 50.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |