[S1M-2445] Decision Time — 15 Nov 2001 at 16:26
Fiona McLeod MP, West of Scotland voted in the minority (No).
This looks like the vote on S1M-2445
The description in the bulletin on 2001-11-14 is:
*S1M-2445 Mr Jim Wallace: Anti-Terrorism, Crime & Security Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament recognises the urgency of enhancing anti-terrorist capability and security in the current international situation and agrees that the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill that relate to devolved matters should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Iain Gray*
The description in the bulletin on 2001-11-15 is:
*S1M-2445 Mr Jim Wallace: Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament recognises the urgency of enhancing anti-terrorist capability and security in the current international situation and agrees that the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Bill *specified in the Scottish Executive’s memorandum* that relate to devolved matters should be considered by the UK Parliament.
You can search for this motion (S1M-2445) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that motion S1M-2445, in the name of Jim Wallace on the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill-UK legislation-be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 78.9% |
Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 85.5% |
LDem | 13 | 0 | 0 | 81.3% |
SNP | 0 | 27 | 0 | 81.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 75 | 30 | 1 | 82.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |