Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — Clause 109 and 110 — Implementation of the third pillar — 21 Nov 2001 at 22:00
Ian Lucas MP, Wrexham voted with the majority (Aye).
The Aye-voters agreed that Clauses 109 and 110 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill (or, as they became, Clauses 111 and 112 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001) should be part of the law.
These two clauses gave an authorized minister (Secretary of State, First Minister in the Scottish Parliament, etc.) the ability to make regulations to implement obligations arising from the third pillar of the Maastricht Treaty of Europe, which is the part to do with cooperation in justice and home affairs.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||136 (+1 tell)||0||83.5%|
|Lab||342 (+2 tell)||6||0||85.4%|
|LDem||0||46 (+1 tell)||0||90.4%|
|Jeremy Corbyn||Islington North||Lab||no|
|Mr Denzil Davies||Llanelli||Lab||no|
|John Martin McDonnell||Hayes and Harlington||Lab (minister)||no|
|Mr Kevin McNamara||Kingston upon Hull North||Lab||no|
|Alan Simpson||Nottingham South||Lab||no|
|Mr Llew Smith||Blaenau Gwent||Lab||no|
|Sylvia Hermon||North Down||UUP (front bench)||aye|