[S1M-2247.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 28 Nov 2001 at 17:05
Ian Jenkins MP, Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale voted with the majority (No).
This looks like the vote on S1M-2247.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-11-28 is:
*S1M-2247.1 Nicola Sturgeon: Community Care and Health (Scotland) Bill-As an amendment to motion (S1M-2247) in the name of Susan Deacon, insert at end "but in doing so expresses its concern at the lack of a definition of personal care in the Bill similar to that suggested by the Care Development Group and at the fact that negotiations with Her Majesty's Government over the payment of Attendance Allowances have not yet been successfully concluded." Supported by: Shona Robison*, Kay Ullrich*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2247.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
We come now to decision time. I have three questions to put. The first question is, that amendment S1M-2247.1, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2247, in the name of Susan Deacon, be agreed to. Are we all agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 14 | 0 | 0 | 73.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 53 | 0 | 0 | 96.4% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 1 | 93.8% |
| SNP | 0 | 28 | 0 | 84.8% |
| Total: | 81 | 30 | 1 | 88.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
| Keith Raffan | Mid Scotland and Fife | LDem | abstention |