[S1M-2487.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 29 Nov 2001 at 17:09
John Swinney MP, North Tayside voted in the minority (No).
This looks like the vote on S1M-2487.1
The description in the bulletin on 2001-11-29 is:
*S1M-2487.1 Peter Peacock: Proportional Representation in Local Government Elections—As an amendment to motion (S1M-2487) in the name of Tricia Marwick, leave out from "approves" to end and insert "notes the Scottish Executive’s continuing commitment to the pledge made in its Programme for Government to make progress on electoral reform, to the principles of renewing local democracy as set out in the Kerley report, including the importance of the member/ward link in local government, to the need to secure general consent and wide support for the system of electing local councils and to producing a timetable for further progress with urgency." Supported by: Euan Robson*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2487.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S1M-2487.1, in the name of Peter Peacock, which seeks to amend motion S1M-2487, in the name of Tricia Marwick, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 0 | 15 | 78.9% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 52 | 0 | 0 | 94.5% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
| SNP | 0 | 29 | 0 | 87.9% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 66 | 34 | 15 | 89.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||