Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Bill — 6 Dec 2001 at 17:22

Lord Razzall voted with the majority (Content).

Schedule 4 [Miscellaneous]:

[Amendment No. 4 not moved.]

Clause 19 [Disclosure of information held by revenue departments]:

moved Amendment No. 5:

Page 9, line 18, at end insert-

X( ) Information may only be disclosed voluntarily under this section if the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or the Commissioners of Customs and Excise believe or suspect that the disclosure may be of information which directly or indirectly relates to a risk to national security or to a terrorist.

( ) Any request by a relevant public authority for disclosure of information under this section may only be made if it believes or suspects that that information may relate directly or indirectly to any risk to national security or to a terrorist.

( ) XRelevant public authority" has the same meaning as in Chapter 2 of Part 1 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (c. 23) save that there is added thereto the Financial Services Authority and the Director of Public Prosecutions.

( ) XTerrorist" has the same meaning as in Part 4 of this Act."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 5) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 227; Not-Contents, 138.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop2 07.4%
Con147 (+1 tell) 066.7%
Ind Lab1 0100.0%
Lab0 124 (+2 tell)64.6%
LDem53 (+1 tell) 081.8%
Other0 15.0%
UUP2 066.7%
Crossbench20 1117.8%
Total:225 13651.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive