National Health Service Reform and Health Care Professions Bill — Schedule 2 — Reallocation of Functions of Health Authorities to Primary Care Trusts — 15 Jan 2002 at 21:45
Mrs Virginia Bottomley MP, South West Surrey voted in the minority (No).
Amendment made: No. 82, in page 58, line 9, leave out "before "Health Authority"" and insert-
'after "Strategic Health Authority," (inserted by paragraph 28(d) of Schedule 1 to this Act)'.-[Mr. Hutton.]
It being 10 o'clock, Mr. Speaker then proceeded to put forthwith the Questions necessary for the disposal of the business to be concluded at that hour, pursuant to Order [20 November 2001].
Remaining Government amendments agreed to.
Motion made, and Question put, That the Bill be now read the Third time.
The House divided: Ayes 324, Noes 201.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 140 (+2 tell) | 0 | 86.6% |
DUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 40.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 324 (+2 tell) | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
LDem | 0 | 45 | 0 | 84.9% |
PC | 0 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 324 | 201 | 0 | 81.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
George Howarth | Knowsley North and Sefton East | Lab | no |