[S1M-2839.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 7 Mar 2002 at 17:02
Dorothy-Grace Elder MP, Glasgow abstained
This looks like the vote on S1M-2839.1
The description in the bulletin on 2002-03-07 is:
*S1M-2839.1 Malcolm Chisholm: Community Care—As an amendment to motion (S1M-2839) in the name of Mary Scanlon, leave out from "notes" to end and insert "acknowledges the progress that is being made towards joint resourcing and joint management of older people’s services; looks forward to further developments in the Joint Future agenda; welcomes the provision of significant extra resources for dealing with the problems of delayed discharge and care home fees, and recognises that such resources are part of the biggest ever investment in care services for older people." Supported by: Mrs Mary Mulligan*, Hugh Henry*
You can search for this motion (S1M-2839.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S1M-2839.1, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, which seeks to amend the motion in the name of Mary Scanlon, on community care, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 94.7% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 2 | 100.0% |
Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 89.1% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
SNP | 0 | 0 | 27 | 81.8% |
SSP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Total: | 64 | 19 | 30 | 88.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |