Hunting with Dogs: Self-Supervision Scheme — 18 Mar 2002 at 21:50
Wayne David MP, Caerphilly voted with the majority (No).
The Aye-voters failed to pass the motion:
This House considers that arrangements for the supervision of the hunting of wild mammals with dogs should be given statutory effect by provision similar to Schedule 1 to the Hunting Bill as introduced into the Commons last session.
The rejected schedule would allowed hunting to continue under a self-supervision scheme.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Lab||355 (+2 tell)||0 (+2 tell)||0||87.6%|
|David Amess||Southend West||Con (front bench)||no|
|David Atkinson||Bournemouth East||Con||no|
|Michael Fabricant||Lichfield||Con (front bench)||no|
|John Randall||Uxbridge||Con (front bench)||no|
|Teddy Taylor||Rochford and Southend East||Con||no|
|Ann Widdecombe||Maidstone and The Weald||Con||no|
|John Heppell||Nottingham East||Lab (minister)||tellaye|
|Tony McNulty||Harrow East||Lab (minister)||tellaye|
|Alan Beith||Berwick-upon-Tweed||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Nick Harvey||North Devon||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Archy Kirkwood||Roxburgh and Berwickshire||LDem||aye|
|Michael Moore||Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Robert Smith||West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|John Thurso||Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Paul Tyler||North Cornwall||LDem||aye|
|Roger Williams||Brecon and Radnorshire||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Elfyn Llwyd||Meirionnydd Nant Conwy||PC (front bench)||aye|
|Lady Hermon||North Down||UUP (front bench)||no|