Hunting with dogs: Hunting under Licence — 19 Mar 2002 at 18:32
Lord Hoyle voted in the minority (Not-Content).
a free "indicative" vote to guide the Government on how to deal with the issue of hunting with dogs. Those voting "content" in this division were supporting a licensing scheme - in accordance with provision similar to Schedule 2 to the Hunting Bill as introduced in the Commons in Session 2000–01 [Bill 2].
Other votes covered the options of self-regulation of hunting and a ban. The House of Commons had held its own "indicative" votes the previous day.
Their Lordships divided: Contents 366; Not-Contents, 59.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Lab||65 (+2 tell)||48 (+1 tell)||59.8%|
|LDem||37||6 (+1 tell)||66.7%|