Animal Health Bill — 26 Mar 2002 at 17:17
Baroness Crawley voted in the minority (Not-Content).
rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do now resolve itself into a Committee on the Bill, to leave out from ( "House" ) to the end and insert "declines to consider the Bill in Committee until
(i) the responses to the consultation on implementation of powers in the Bill have been considered and Her Majesty's Government have published their response; and
(ii) Her Majesty's Government have received, considered and published the results of the inquiries they have commissioned into foot and mouth disease from the National Audit Office and the Royal Society."
On Question, Whether the said amendment shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 130; Not-Contents, 124.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 2 | 0 | 7.4% |
Con | 91 (+1 tell) | 0 | 40.4% |
Crossbench | 26 (+1 tell) | 2 | 16.5% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 118 (+2 tell) | 60.9% |
LDem | 5 | 2 | 10.6% |
UUP | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 127 | 122 | 36.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Boston of Faversham | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Greengross | Crossbench | no |
Lord Mackie of Benshie | LDem | no |
Lord Rodgers of Quarry Bank | LDem (front bench) | no |