Employment Bill — 11 Jun 2002 at 15:32

Lord Grenfell voted with the majority (Not-Content).

moved Amendment No. 35:

Page 35, line 33, at end insert-

"(4) Minor and inconsequential breach by an employer or employee of the requirements of Schedule 2 shall not result in his suffering any detriment in any proceedings before an employment tribunal and the employer shall not be deemed thereby to have wrongly dismissed the employee."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 35) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 114; Not-Contents, 130.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 69 (+2 tell)32.1%
Green0 1100.0%
Ind Lab1 0100.0%
Lab118 (+2 tell) 062.2%
LDem0 3350.0%
Other1 06.7%
UUP0 133.3%
Crossbench8 89.2%
Total:128 11236.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive