Lords Amendment No. 110 — 22 Jul 2002 at 18:28
Viscount Tenby was absent
110 Clause 251, page 148, line 29, at beginning insert "Subject to section (Proceedings brought under section 251: defence of respondent),"
The Commons disagreed to this amendment for the following reason:
110A Because it is not appropriate to provide any such exceptions, the House having reached its decision without the opportunity for debate.
rose to move that this House do not insist on their Amendment No. 110 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 110A but do propose the following amendment in lieu thereof-
110BClause 2, page 2, line 21, at end insert-
"(6) The guidance must indicate that the reduction in crime is in general best secured by means of criminal investigations and criminal proceedings."
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 126; Not-Contents, 44.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 1 | 0 | 3.8% |
Con | 0 | 27 (+1 tell) | 12.5% |
Crossbench | 2 | 11 (+1 tell) | 8.0% |
Independent Labour | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Independent Socialist | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 119 (+2 tell) | 0 | 61.7% |
LDem | 0 | 2 | 3.0% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
Total: | 123 | 42 | 24.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Ouseley | Crossbench | aye |
Lord Patel | Crossbench (front bench) | aye |