Lords Amendment — 23 Jul 2002 at 17:45
Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted with the majority (Teller for the Contents).
12Leave out Clause 10
The Commons disagreed to this amendment but proposed the following amendment, to the words so restored to the Bill-
12A Page 7, line 16, leave out from second "company" to end of line 17 and insert "registered under the Companies Act 1985 (c. 6) as a company limited by shares or a company limited by guarantee"
rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that this House do not insist on their Amendment No. 12 to which the Commons have disagreed and do agree to Amendment No. 12A to the words so restored to the Bill, leave out from "House" to end and insert "do insist on their Amendment No. 12".
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 12B) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 172; Not-Contents, 168.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 0 | 3 | 11.5% |
| Con | 123 (+1 tell) | 0 | 56.1% |
| Ind Lab | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 137 (+2 tell) | 72.0% |
| LDem | 42 (+1 tell) | 0 | 65.2% |
| Other | 0 | 3 | 20.0% |
| UUP | 1 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Crossbench | 3 | 21 | 14.1% |
| Total: | 170 | 166 | 48.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Laird | UUP | aye |