Adoption and Children Bill — 14 Oct 2002 at 15:56
Lord Neill of Bladen voted with the majority (Not-Content).
Clause 1 [Considerations applying to the exercise of powers]:
moved Amendment No. 1:
Page 1, line 15, at end insert "which if the child is of sufficient understanding shall be heard as expressed by the child"
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 1) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 64; Not-Contents, 109.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||0||24 (+2 tell)||11.8%|
|Lab||95 (+2 tell)||0||50.5%|
|Lord Chalfont||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Emerton||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Hannay of Chiswick||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Howe of Idlicote||Crossbench||aye|
|Baroness Masham of Ilton||Crossbench||aye|
|Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Simon of Glaisdale||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Williamson of Horton||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|