Nuclear Power — Not competitive — rejected — 22 Oct 2002 at 21:50
The majority of MPs voted against the motion:[1]
- This House
- notes with concern the decision of the Government to put at risk over £600 million of public funds in order to prevent the bankruptcy of the privatised nuclear power company British Energy;
- further notes that several competitor companies in the deregulated market also face financial collapse and that some are petitioning for Government assistance;
- believes that nuclear power has been shown in a competitive market to be uneconomic as well as to generate long-term environmental costs in respect of waste disposal and decommissioning;
- further believes that it would be wrong for the Government to continue to bail out British Energy shareholders with a massive unplanned injection of public money or encourage new nuclear power projects; and
- calls on Her Majesty's Government urgently to bring forward its response to the PIU energy review,[2] with measures to initiate a sustained long-term improvement in energy efficiency and conservation, and to facilitate the more rapid introduction of a variety of new renewable energy technologies as the favoured electricity generating source in the long-term, taking into account the Government's Kyoto targets and the Prime Minister's support for sustainable energy use at Johannesburg.
An alternative motion was put in its place and voted through.[3]
- [1] Vincent Cable MP, House of Commons, 22 October 2002
- [2] Energy Review, Performance and Innovation Unit, February 2002
- [3] Nuclear Power - Will be addressed on its own merits, House of Commons, 22 October 2002
All Votes Cast - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote