Enterprise Bill — 28 Oct 2002 at 18:14

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted with the majority (Not-Content).

Clause 133 [Questions to be decided on market investigation references]:

[Amendments Nos. 27 and 28 not moved.]

Clause 178 [Review of decisions under Part 4]:

moved Amendment No. 29:

Page 135, line 14, at end insert-

"( ) For this purpose "any person aggrieved" shall mean any person who is a subject of the reference or possible reference and who is directly affected by the decision."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 29) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 72; Not-Contents, 113.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 65 (+2 tell)30.2%
Crossbench3 44.1%
Green0 1100.0%
Lab108 (+2 tell) 056.4%
LDem0 00.0%
Total:111 7028.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Bhatia Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord St John of BletsoCrossbenchno
Lord Weatherill Crossbench (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive