Lords Amendment — 7 Nov 2002 at 13:40

Lord Henley voted with the majority (Content).

14 Clause 6, page 3, leave out lines 28 to 37 and insert- "(5) The second condition is that each of the following applies to the occupier of the premises-

(a) he has been informed of the decision to seek entry to the premises and of the reasons for that decision;

(b) he has failed to allow entry to the premises on being requested to do so by an inspector;

(c) he has been informed of the decision to apply for the warrant and of the reasons for that decision including a copy of the sworn information;

(d) he has been provided with an opportunity to make representations to the justice of the peace about whether the warrant should be issued;

(e) he has been provided with the opportunity to present sworn information in person or in writing to the justice of the peace who is to consider the application for a warrant." (6) The third condition is that-

(a) the premises are unoccupied or the occupier is absent and (in either case) notice of intention to apply for the warrant has been left in a conspicuous place on the premises, or

(b) an application for admission to the premises or the giving of notice of intention to apply for the warrant would defeat the object of entering the premises." The Commons agreed to this amendment with the following amendment-

14A Line 8, leave out from "warrant" to the end of line 16

rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 14A to Lords Amendment No. 14, leave out "agree" and insert "disagree".

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 14B) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 144; Not-Contents, 108.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con91 (+1 tell) 042.4%
Green1 0100.0%
Ind Lab1 0100.0%
Lab0 102 (+2 tell)54.2%
LDem35 (+1 tell) 054.5%
Other0 213.3%
Crossbench14 29.6%
Total:142 10638.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive