[S1M-3602.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 21 Nov 2002 at 17:02

This looks like the vote on S1M-3602.2

The description in the bulletin on 2002-11-21 is:

*S1M-3602.2 Fergus Ewing: Scottish Executive Response to the Foot-and-Mouth Disease Inquiries—As an amendment to motion (S1M-3602) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from "and welcomes" to end and insert "; welcomes the fact that the Scottish Parliament was able to deal with the foot-and-mouth crisis more efficiently than it was tackled in England; endorses many of the proposals contained within the Scottish Executive response to the inquiries but considers that insufficient progress has been made to tighten import controls; believes that emergency vaccination should be deployed in any future outbreak, that there should be a total transfer to Scotland of all necessary power to handle any such outbreak and that the continued application of the 20-day rule is creating significant difficulties for Scottish farmers and crofters, and considers that the restrictions on access to the countryside were retained for far too long and had a severe impact upon the rural economy of many parts of Scotland."

You can search for this motion (S1M-3602.2) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The fifth question is, that amendment S1M-3602.2, in the name of Fergus Ewing, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3602, in the name of Ross Finnie, on the Scottish Executive response to foot-and-mouth disease inquiries, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |