Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill [Money] — 17 Dec 2002 at 22:25
Peter Ainsworth MP, East Surrey voted in the minority (No).
Queen's recommendation having been signified-
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 52(1)(a) (Money resolutions and ways and means resolutions in connection with bills),
That, for the purposes of any Act resulting from the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill, it is expedient to authorise-
(1) the payment out of money provided by Parliament of-
(a) any expenses of the Secretary of State in making grants in connection with the provision of advice in relation to the planning Acts; and
(b) any increase attributable to the Act in the sums so payable under any other enactment;
(2) the payment into the Consolidated Fund of any increase attributable to the Act in the sums so payable under any other enactment.-[Gillian Merron.]
The House divided: Ayes 329, Noes 130.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||121 (+2 tell)||0||75.5%|
|Lab||285 (+2 tell)||0||0||70.0%|