[S1M-3748] Decision Time — 9 Jan 2003 at 17:04
Ben Wallace MP, North East Scotland voted with the majority (Aye).
This looks like the vote on S1M-3748
The description in the bulletin on 2003-01-08 is:
*S1M-3748 Cathy Jamieson: Review of Child Protection-That the Parliament notes the findings of the report of the Child Protection Audit and Review, It's everyone's job to make sure I'm alright; expresses concern that, despite examples of good practice in child protection across Scotland, many children and young people are still at risk of abuse and neglect, and supports the Scottish Executive's plans for a sustained programme of reform, building on effective inter-agency working, and its continued emphasis on closing the opportunity gap for Scotland's most vulnerable young people. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
You can search for this motion (S1M-3748) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The sixth question is, that motion S1M-3748, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the review of child protection, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 18 | 0 | 0 | 94.7% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 51 | 0 | 0 | 92.7% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 28 | 84.8% |
| SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 87 | 0 | 29 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||