House of Lords Reform — House of Lords to be abolished — rejected — 4 Feb 2003 at 16:58
Ms Ann Coffey MP, Stockport voted with the majority (No).
The majority No voters rejected a proposal that the House of Lords be completely abolished. Those voting Aye were indicating that, at least in theory, they thought that the upper chamber of Parliament could be abolished entirely. Those voting No were indicating that they believed that there had to be an upper chamber of Parliament in some form.
-  http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2003-02-04.220.2
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Lab||184 (+2 tell)||158 (+2 tell)||0||84.4%|