Courts Bill [HL] — 27 Mar 2003 at 11:22
Lord Christopher voted in the minority (Not-Content).
[Amendment No. 132B not moved.]
moved Amendment No. 132C:
Page 42, line 10, at end insert-
"( ) The Lord Chancellor may not under this section seek to recover judicial salaries."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 132C) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 90; Not-Contents, 87.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Con | 49 (+2 tell) | 0 | 23.6% |
Crossbench | 14 | 4 | 10.5% |
Lab | 0 | 81 (+2 tell) | 42.8% |
LDem | 23 | 0 | 35.4% |
Total: | 86 | 85 | 27.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Bhatia | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Boston of Faversham | Crossbench | no |
Lord Craig of Radley | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness Masham of Ilton | Crossbench | no |