Courts Bill [HL] — 27 Mar 2003 at 11:22

Lord Newby was absent

[Amendment No. 132B not moved.]

moved Amendment No. 132C:

Page 42, line 10, at end insert-

"( ) The Lord Chancellor may not under this section seek to recover judicial salaries."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 132C) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 90; Not-Contents, 87.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con49 (+2 tell) 023.9%
Crossbench14 410.6%
Lab0 81 (+2 tell)43.9%
LDem23 035.4%
Total:86 8527.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Lord Bhatia Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Boston of FavershamCrossbenchno
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Masham of IltonCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive