Criminal Justice Bill — Clause 99 — Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence — 2 Apr 2003 at 16:15

Claire Ward MP, Watford voted with the majority (No).

I beg to move amendment No. 146, in page 60, line 6, leave out 'admissible' and insert 'not to be admitted'.

Question put, That the amendment be made:-

The House divided: Ayes 182, Noes 297.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con0 126077.3%
DUP0 2040.0%
Independent0 10100.0%
Lab296 (+2 tell) 2073.2%
LDem0 42 (+2 tell)083.0%
PC0 3075.0%
SDLP1 0033.3%
SNP0 1020.0%
UUP0 5083.3%
Total:297 182074.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Mr Denzil DaviesLlanelliLabaye
Dr Jim MarshallLeicester SouthLabaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive